The not-so-open OpenXML
Friday, February 16th, 2007I must say that I’m very proud of my company! This article explains why.
MSFT’s always used their economic power to impose their products to people/organizations. Now they should be really pissed that someone is using their own processes to fight them.
I haven’t read the msft open letter, but from this article on itwire there are two interesting sentences:
The open letter ignores the fact at least seven countries also submitted formal objections to Open XML becoming an international standard. All up, nineteen countries submitted comments and objections.
We can see that the world is opening their eyes. OpenSource tools and formats are becoming a viable and much less expensive alternative, so worldwide organizations now have the cheese and the knife on their hands. I believe the goal of this countries is to get OpenXML to be really OPEN and a TRUE standard, what would lead to free or low price office suites to work with it thus saving the exorbitant of MSFT Office.
While Microsoft describes Open XML as open source, it’s not licensed in a fashion that proponents of open source licensing would recognise as being open. Rather than granting users open source-like rights to the format, the license consists of a promise by Microsoft not to sue those who use the format. It also leaves the standard open to drop in proprietary code.
This is a pearl! Besides not really opening the format to the community, they promise not to sue the people who uses the format. If there is something I don’t trust, that is a promise from a corporation whose goal is just to make money regardless of moral values, even more when that company has had unfair practices in the past and which only goal is to have a monopoly on the software world.
Popularity: 4% [?]







